| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 19 post(s) |
Hendrick Tallardar
SniggWaffe
WAFFLES.
153
   |
Posted - 2014.03.28 20:38:00 -
[1] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Malcanis wrote:
It's about what was happening after erotica1 & co already had all the mark's ISK, assets and even his API. Once they've got all his stuff, then what happened after that wasn't about being an evil character in game. It was just about being evil.
Then talking to them on TS was evil? Like I said, I guess I just dont get it Then get this: once you've got all your target's money and killed all his ships, leave him alone.
So let's say I get scammed/ganked by a guy in a ransom. If he sends me a smug EVE Mail is that considered harassing? If I get killed auto-piloting and someone sends a "you need to pay your autopilot license" mail, is that harassing?
Basically what I'm getting at is where does the "line" stand on what is considered harassing and going to far after you do something in-game (i.e. suicide gank, steal, etc.)
LeeSsang. Never Forget. |
Hendrick Tallardar
SniggWaffe
WAFFLES.
153
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 20:46:00 -
[2] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Tell me where you think it is.
I'm asking you, given that you're privy to the CSM/CCP discussions about this matter where that line is determined at.
LeeSsang. Never Forget. |
Hendrick Tallardar
SniggWaffe
WAFFLES.
153
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 20:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Hendrick Tallardar wrote:Malcanis wrote:Tell me where you think it is. I'm asking you, given that you're privy to the CSM/CCP discussions about this matter where that line is determined at. Well I'm not as smart as you so it would be super helpful to have your definition of where it lies; one that can't be rules-lawyered around or meta-gamed.
Again, I asked you. I'm not trying to rules-lawyer around something or meta-game. If you're more concerned with being a condescending prick because someone asked you a question be my guest.
LeeSsang. Never Forget. |
Hendrick Tallardar
SniggWaffe
WAFFLES.
156
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 21:15:00 -
[4] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Hendrick Tallardar wrote:Malcanis wrote:Hendrick Tallardar wrote:Malcanis wrote:Tell me where you think it is. I'm asking you, given that you're privy to the CSM/CCP discussions about this matter where that line is determined at. Well I'm not as smart as you so it would be super helpful to have your definition of where it lies; one that can't be rules-lawyered around or meta-gamed. Again, I asked you. I'm not trying to rules-lawyer around something or meta-game. If you're more concerned with being a condescending prick because someone asked you a question be my guest. I'm sorry, but I don't believe you. I think you're lying because I've repeatedly explained how the line is defined, and you've ignored that because you want a definition you can attack. Don't worry, your FCs aren't going to be banned for... emphatically criticising you on alliance comms. That specific issue was definitely covered.
So your flawed and made up assumptions are reason enough to hurl ad hominem? Tsk Tsk Malcanis, and here I thought you weren't so quick to being defensive.
As I said, I genuinely am not looking for something to attack, only for clarification. If you could link to the specific post which you feel covers my question then do so, I personally don't have the time to waste sifting through 40 pages of two CSM members sperging at other people who are sperging back.
LeeSsang. Never Forget. |
| |
|